Skip to content
Voltra Technologies home

React Development

React interfaces that stay fast as they grow

React and Next.js development in Chennai. Interfaces, dashboards and web applications that stay fast as the data grows and the team changes.

Typical timeline
6 to 16 weeks
Indicative range
₹1,20,000 to ₹9,00,000
Laptop, phone and notebook on a developer's desk

What you get

The outcome you are actually buying.

  • A performance budget enforced by the build, not by good intentions
  • One documented component library instead of four versions of a button
  • Typed data access, so an API change breaks the build rather than production
  • Accessibility to WCAG 2.1 AA included rather than retrofitted
  • An application that stays usable on a mid range Android phone

What is included

Specific deliverables, agreed in writing before anything starts.

  • Component library documented in a living styleguide
  • React or Next.js application with typed data access
  • Accessibility to WCAG 2.1 AA
  • Performance budget agreed and enforced by the build
  • Automated component and end to end tests
  • Handover documentation for your team

How we work

You see progress every week on a URL you can open, not a demo at the end.

  1. 01

    Interface and data model

    We agree what the screens are and exactly what data each one needs before a single component is written. Most rework comes from skipping this.

  2. 02

    Component library first

    Buttons, inputs, tables, and the empty, loading and error states that are always skipped and always missed. Documented in a living styleguide.

  3. 03

    Screens

    Assembled from the library and reviewed weekly against real data at real volumes, not three tidy demo rows.

  4. 04

    Measure

    Real device testing and a Lighthouse budget that fails the pipeline on regression.

  5. 05

    Handover

    Repository, styleguide and a walkthrough so your team can extend it without us.

The problem

React makes it easy to start and easy to get slow. Six months in, the bundle is two megabytes, every keystroke rerenders half the page, three developers have invented three different buttons, and nobody wants to touch the state management.

On a fast laptop it feels fine. On a mid range Android phone on a patchy connection, which is where most of your users are, it does not.

What we build instead

Interfaces with a performance budget agreed up front and enforced by the build, so a regression fails the pipeline rather than reaching production. Typed data access, so a change to the API surfaces as a compile error rather than a blank screen at eleven at night.

One component library, documented, so the fourth developer builds the same button as the first.

How we work

  1. Interface and data model. We agree what the screens are and what data each one needs before writing components.
  2. Component library first. Buttons, inputs, tables, empty states, loading states, error states. The boring ones are the ones that get skipped.
  3. Screens. Assembled from the library, reviewed weekly against real data.
  4. Measure. Real device testing and a Lighthouse budget before launch.

Accessibility is part of the build

Keyboard operability, correct roles and labels, visible focus, and contrast that passes at 4.5 to 1. It is far cheaper to build in than to retrofit, and in many sectors it is now a procurement requirement.

Who this is for

Teams building dashboards, portals, booking systems and internal tools, and teams with an existing React codebase that has become difficult to change.

Why React applications get slow

The pattern is consistent. Every component fetches its own data, so one screen makes thirty requests. State lives in a global store that rerenders half the tree on every keystroke. The bundle grows because a date library was imported for one function. Nobody notices, because everyone develops on a fast laptop on office broadband.

Then it ships, and a customer on a three year old Android phone waits eleven seconds.

We set a performance budget at the start and enforce it in the pipeline. A pull request that pushes the bundle past the limit fails, which turns performance into a rule rather than an argument.

Next.js or plain React

Next.js for anything public facing that needs to be found, because it renders on the server and crawlers receive real HTML. If search visibility matters at all, this is not a preference, it is a requirement.

Plain React for tools behind a login, where nothing needs indexing and the extra framework surface buys you nothing.

We will tell you which applies rather than defaulting to whichever is fashionable.

Rescuing a slow application

We start by measuring rather than guessing, profiling render counts, bundle composition and network waterfalls on real hardware.

The output is a prioritised list with the cost and the expected gain of each fix, so you can decide how far to go. Frequently a handful of changes recover most of the performance without a rewrite, and we will say so even though a rewrite is the larger project.

Design systems

If you have more than two products, or more than three developers, a documented component library pays for itself within months. Without one, each developer invents their own spacing, colours and interaction patterns, and the product slowly stops looking like one product.

We deliver it as a living styleguide that runs in the browser rather than a static document, so it cannot drift out of date with the code.

Accessibility

Keyboard operability, correct roles and labels, visible focus, sensible focus order and contrast that passes at 4.5 to 1. Building it in adds a small percentage to the project. Retrofitting it after launch routinely costs several times more, and it is increasingly a procurement requirement in enterprise and government work.

Testing

Component tests on the pieces that carry logic, and end to end tests through the journeys that matter commercially: sign in, search, checkout, submit. Enough to deploy on a Friday without anxiety, not so many that the suite becomes the thing slowing you down.

What we build with

Chosen per project rather than by habit. We will tell you when a simpler option would serve you better.

  • React
  • Next.js
  • TypeScript
  • Tailwind CSS
  • TanStack Query
  • Zod
  • Playwright
  • Vitest

Who this is for

  • Teams building dashboards, portals, booking systems and internal tools
  • Companies with a React codebase that has become slow or hard to change
  • Product teams with engineers but no design system to build against

When this is not the answer. A content site with no interactivity does not need React. It will be faster and cheaper as static pages.

Questions

Before you ask us

Anything not covered here, send it through the form and you will get a straight answer.

Next.js for anything public facing that needs to rank, because it renders on the server and search engines see real HTML. Plain React for internal tools behind a login, where search visibility is irrelevant and the build is simpler.

Start a project

Tell us what you need.

A reply within one working day from someone who can answer, not an acknowledgement and silence.

What happens next

  1. 1We read it and reply within one working day, usually sooner.
  2. 2A short call to understand the problem. No charge and no sales sequence.
  3. 3If we are a fit, a written scope and a fixed price before any work starts.

Enquire about React Development

Name and number are all we genuinely need. The rest helps us come back with something useful.

We usually reply on WhatsApp first.

We reply within one working day. No sales sequence.